Validity and reliability of velocity and power measures provided by the Vitruve linear position transducer
 
Yazarlar (7)
Santiago A. Ruiz-Alias University of Granada, İspanya
Deniz Şentürk İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Zeki Akyıldız Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Onat ÇETİN Yalova Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Selman KAYA Yalova Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Pérez-Castilla Alejandro
Ivan Jukic
Auckland University of Technology
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı PLOS ONE (Q2)
Dergi ISSN 1932-6203 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SCI-Expanded
Makale Dili Türkçe Basım Tarihi 10-2024
Kabul Tarihi Yayınlanma Tarihi 24-10-2024
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 19 / 10 / – DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0312348
Makale Linki http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312348
Özet
This study aimed to determine the validity and between-day reliability of the mean velocity (MV), peak velocity (PV), mean power (MP), and peak power (PP) provided by the Vitruve linear position transducer at different submaximal loads in the free-weight and Smith machine back squat using GymAware as a reference point. Fourteen male sports science students (free-weight back squat one-repetition maximum [1RM]: 132.5 ± 28.5 kg, Smith machine back squat 1RM: 163.9 ± 30.4 kg) performed six experimental sessions, twice per week with 72 hours of rest. The first two included the assessment of the 1RM of both exercises. In the four remaining, both linear position transducers were simultaneously used to record MV, PV, MP, PP of each repetition during an incremental load test (i.e., 20, 40, 60, 80, 90% 1RM) with three minutes of rest between sets. Vitruve displayed both fixed and proportional bias for certain relative loads across all variables. Vitruve did not meet the validity criteria for all (MV, PP) or at least two (MP, PV) relative loads (Coefficient of variation [CV] > 10%; Pearson correlation < 0.70; Effect size > 0.60). MV, PV, MP, and PP recorded by Vitruve displayed acceptable reliability (CV < 10%) with superior reliability observed during a Smith Machine compared to free-weight back squat, and for velocity compared to power variables. Considering GymAware as a reference point, Vitruve was not valid for measuring velocity and power outcomes. Acceptable validity was observed only for PV in the Smith machine back squat, while the other variables--regardless of relative loads and exercise modes--were mostly inaccurate. All variables ...
Anahtar Kelimeler
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
Web of Science 6
Google Scholar 13
Validity and reliability of velocity and power measures provided by the Vitruve linear position transducer

Paylaş