An Examination of the Emissions, Cost, and Time of Intermodal Transportation
Yazarlar (3)
Kubilay Bayramoğlu Türkiye
Şaban Çelikoğlu Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi İshak TURAN Yalova Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü |
Özgün Makale
(SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
|
||
| Dergi Adı | Sustainability (Q2) | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 2071-1050 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SSCI | ||
| Makale Dili | Türkçe | Basım Tarihi | 03-2025 |
| Kabul Tarihi | – | Yayınlanma Tarihi | 07-03-2025 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 17 / 6 / – | DOI | 10.3390/su17062368 |
| Makale Linki | https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062368 | ||
| Özet |
| Deciding on appropriate transport modes is critical in terms of emissions, time, and cost. However, transport routes do not always allow for the selection of the most cost-effective and environmentally friendly modes of transport. Therefore, various modes of transportation must be used together to overcome these constraints. This study investigates the use of a combination of different transportation modes in container transport from Filyos in Turkey to Vienna. Constanța has been selected as the trans-shipment port on the transport route, and three distinct modes of transport have been used from Constanța to Vienna, including road, rail, and riverway. As a result of this study, the fuel consumption, CO2 emissions, time, and cost for each intermodal transport type were evaluated comparatively. Although seaway transportation is advantageous in terms of emissions, cost, and fuel consumption, it is determined that road transport is more beneficial in terms of time. The maximum and minimum CO2 emissions were calculated to be 2,107,124 tonnes and 365.6 tonnes for roadway and seaway transportation, respectively. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| intermodal transportation | CO2 emissions | transportation routes | environmental impact | freight time |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları |